I saw this story in the Winnipeg Free Press yesterday. There was a bicycle and a suitcase chained to a sign downtown and someone decided it must be a bomb because they couldn’t find the owner. The cops blocked off traffic and brought in a fucking robot.
Police blew up the suitcase around 8 p.m. to a loud bang and a blast of white smoke, but the suitcase turned out to be a dud. "There is no indication there was anything explosive (in the suitcase)," Michalyshen said.
I have issues with the police overreaction but I have greater issues with the story’s use of words. I don’t think it counts as a “dud” if it was a suitcase filled with non-explosive materials that wasn’t trying to be a bomb. Using the word dud in the story implies that it was a bomb that was faulty. Matt Preprost calls it a dud twice in the story to justify an overreaction by scared people. It seems that it was actually a functional suitcase and didn’t “fail to work properly” until the police blew it up since its proper function was containing shit.
Stupid.bomb dud fear journalism language matt preprost police winnipeg winnipeg free press