Tagged with economics

the studenty life

Today I gathered texts for assignments all day. Woo. Our management class has its first assignment due in a couple of weeks, and that requires a whole hell of a lot of books on management and economics and libraries to be annotated for a bibliography. Don’t you wish you were in library school?

Doing this kind of thing is much easier than I imagine it used to be when you couldn’t lie in bed with your laptop all day, reserving books from all over the area to be delivered to places conducive to being picked up, or just getting the documents loaded onto your computer. I did go out to the VPL to grab a stack of books. Just for the thrill of going to the library and hurting my shoulder by overloading my bag.

And I did laundry and bought groceries. Wee. Exciting. Aren’t you glad I’m writing about this?

So many of my classmates seem so much more busy than me. All with their multiple jobs and things. I’ve just got my classes and the assignments, which I might as well do now since maybe I’ll be getting a job at some point to cut into my schoolwork time. This term I don’t have any pressing reason to get my school stuff done early, but I’ve kind of gotten the habit started so it seems better to be working on that stuff than not. It’s basically procrastination from writing or thinking about the future to be working on homework.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

book review: slackonomics

Lisa Chamberlain’s Slackonomics is a book about Generation X and how they live differently than the boomers before them. The thing that makes it different from all the books on the subject from 10-15 years ago is that this one is looking at these GenXers all grown up and in charge of things instead of being the youngsters whose apathy would prove to be the death of civilization.

The subtitle of the book is “Generation X in the Age of Creative Destruction,” referring to the economic bubble collapses we’ve been undergoing in the last ten years (dotcom, subprime mortgages). These collapses are different from previous downturns because they aren’t cyclical but systemic. Or something. The thesis is that though Gen X grew up with the greed motivation of the 80s they also saw how the 90s recession could fuck that all up. They’ve seen terrifying highs and dizzying lows and now they’re 40 and are the people who’ll get us through, past the boomers’ “me me me” motivations.

It was an interesting book, especially when Sean’s been talking about his Helmet Generation stuff recently. As I see it, my immediate cohort we’re sort of the cusp between the Gen Xers and the Helmeteers, and I think I feel more affinity for the Xes.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

i really miss being scholastic

I read a book by a couple of Sean’s profs today. The book was published by a little Winnipeg press so I can’t give you an Amazon link. It’s called Social Murder and has a big ol’ bowl of tomato soup on the cover, which I assume is supposed to be blood, though it may just be soup. It’s a lot brighter than any of the bowls full of blood I’ve ever seen (I can think of three off-hand from China and that doesn’t count sinks full of blood which used to be a regular winter occurrence in my house).

The book though was very interesting. It’s talking about how the capitalist system is a horrible thing, especially when conservative economic thought tries to make sure the state doesn’t get involved. For most of the book it stayed in a much larger scale than I’m used to thinking. It seems when I read about politics I read about specifics of this election or that issue and what these parties have to say. Until this book’s chapter on democracy it stayed somewhat above blaming problems on specific presidents or whatever but was talking about a system in which it doesn’t really matter who’s in charge.

The most interesting chapter was about health stuff. Their point was basically that cancer is the price of capitalist society. It took the discussion out of the realm of genetics and specific behaviours and into the way our society is structured and how that makes us sick (like how overcrowded cities made for horrible nasty infectious diseases in centuries past).

Now I kind of knew some of this stuff before but I’m no expert in any of this, so it’s hard to call bullshit on things. Except for the caricaturization of journalism schools as teaching students to get “both sides of the story.” Jskools actually do get a tad more into things than that. The whole media bias section (seven paragraphs) was a little basic and since it’s something I actually came in with knowledge about I felt a little underwhelmed by the authors’ insight. If I knew more about the rest of the book’s content would I feel they were glossing over a lot of stuff? I don’t know. But for a lay reader it seemed fine.

Tagged , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 199 other followers